Business Plan + Overview
Infant Seat Demo
Toddler Seat Demo
Promo Video
Artist's Gallery
Get Involved!
Child Safety Seat
Questionnaire
Contact
Links
Home
business plan + overview

| Executive Summary | Market Overview | Litigation History + Recent Events | Current Safety Technology |
Revolutionary New Technology | What is the Safety Egg™? |

LITIGATION HISTORY + RECENT EVENTS

Most personal injury litigation is settled out of court. Manufacturers generally carry standard casualty insurance and have additional self-managed polices. Due to the private out of court settlement nature of most cases, litigation history is difficult to assess and liability costs are difficult to quantify. However, in 2003 the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District provided insight by awarding a plaintiff $10.5 million as a result of an injury sustained in a car accident involving a child “properly restrained in a child restraint seat,” Dorel Industries v. Uxa, case #ED81192. Below are some of the relevant points sited in this case.

  • The car seat did not provide adequate protection….from a side impact collision.

  • The seat was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s brain injuries.

  • The Dorel Seat is essentially the same as the other seats on the market in terms of basic design and underlying technology

  • The Dorel seat is defective and unreasonably dangerous
Industry experts testified that current government standards are deficient and that consequently all manufacturers comply with them and build inherently deficient products. Significantly, the Court ruled this is not grounds for defense.

previous | next

© Crash Research, LLC, 2004, All Right Reserved.